TOYOTA RAV4 Liftgate Hinge collective lawsuit was rejected

January 31, 2025 -For the four car owners claim that the hinge cannot withstand the weight and strength of opening and closing the electric liter door, the collective lawsuit of Toyota RAV4 Liftgate Hinge has been rejected.

It is said that customers must sometimes pay thousands of dollars because of hinge corrosion and failure to replace RAV4 to lift the door. The RAV4 driver is facing a constant warning about the open -air lift, which will not be closed due to hinges.

It is said that Toyota knows that the hinge has defects and should warn customers to improve the door. The collective lawsuit also alleged that the distribution store could not or correct the hinge and raised the door, thereby reducing the value of Toyota RAV4.

Toyota also encountered a problem with the scope of the RAV4 Hinge collective lawsuit. The four customers who filed a hinge lawsuit have their own Toyota RAV4 in 2019. However, national collective lawsuits include owners and lessees of all SUVs, which can always be traced back to the 2014 model of the year model of the year in 2021.

According to Toyota, the plaintiff hoped that the judge believed that the guarantee would never expire, and Toyota should always perform free maintenance.

Toyota had a collective lawsuit and told the judge’s plaintiff how the court wanted the court to believe that Toyota had improved the so -called RAV4. Based on the five years since the plaintiff’s purchase of RAV4, this was based on the complaints of three unnamed customers.

Toyota also believes that the technical service announcement issued to the dealer is about highland vehicles, which has nothing to do with RAV4.

The court’s documents cannot be explained a lot, but the plaintiff Zach Hughes, Zach Amsterrand, Audi Murphy and Karl Venora and Toyota have proposed to understand employment.

Judge Edward M. Chen (Edward M. Chen) of all plaintiffs’ claims on the defendant’s claims, all the action and litigation factors rejected the RAV4 hinge lawsuit. “

The judge said that all parties will bear their own expenses and expenses, including lawyer fees and expert costs.

Toyota RAV4 LIFTGATE collective lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in the North of California: Zach Hughes et al., To Toyota Motor Sales, USA, INC. waitEssence

The plaintiff was represented by NYE, Stirling, Hale, Miller & Sweet LLP and Sauder Schelkopf.