United States: Published by the Artificial Intelligence Working Group of the Both Party House of Representatives

in short

On December 17, 2024, the two -party House of Representatives Artificial Intelligence (AI) working group released a report on the “(G) guidance principles, forward -looking suggestions, and policy recommendations to ensure that the United States continues in responsible artificial intelligence innovation aspects of artificial intelligence innovation. Lead the world. These principles, suggestions, and policy suggestions are just a tool, not the final conclusion of artificial intelligence. Therefore, it is expected that the future artificial intelligence legislators will use this report to formulate artificial intelligence policies.

• The report aims to be a tool to formulate and consider artificial intelligence policies as Congress, and encourage the United States to play a leading role in the field of artificial intelligence, and at the same time establish a proper guardrail for any current or new threats.
• This report is divided into 15 chapters, which provides guidance principles, 66 main discoveries and 89 suggestions.
• As Congress is considering artificial intelligence legislation, we should pay close attention to further legal development.

In February 2024, the artificial intelligence working group of the Bolt Party House of Representatives was established to explore the role of Congress in encouraging the United States to play a leading role in artificial intelligence innovation and providing the role of any possible current and emerging threats. On December 17, 2024, the working group issued a report on the Artificial Intelligence Working Group of the Double Party House of Representatives, which aims to guide legislators to formulate such a balanced artificial intelligence policy.

This report defines artificial intelligence as a software system that can perform tasks that usually require human intelligence, such as voice recognition, image analysis, and language translation. ” Treatment and computer vision “.

In this context, the report discusses 15 key areas, including intellectual property, data privacy, medical care and federal priority in state law. Although the report does not fully discuss each area of ​​artificial intelligence, it encourages the future to explore these themes. In addition, the report also uses several advanced principles to build policy analysis, such as determining the novelty of artificial intelligence issues to avoid repeated authorization and the center of human intelligent policies.

The working group outlines the main findings and suggestions in 15 key areas. For example, for intellectual property rights, the report states that “it is unclear whether it is necessary to take legislative operations in some cases, but generating artificial intelligence constitutes a unique challenge to the creative world.” In order to solve this problem, the report recommends “clarifying intellectual property rights Laws, regulations and institutional activities, and at the same time should be appropriately cope with the increasing harm of in -depth fraud in artificial intelligence. “

Similarly, for data privacy, the report found that “artificial intelligence may exacerbate privacy damage, Americans have limited pursuit of many privacy damage, and federal privacy law may enhance state laws.” In order to solve this problem, the report recommends the “exploration mechanism , Promote data access in a way to enhance privacy, and ensure that the privacy law is generally applicable and technically neutral. “

Similarly, in the field of health care, the report found that with the help of artificial intelligence, administrative burden may be reduced, and drug development and clinical diagnosis can be accelerated. However, “the lack of common and unified standards for medical data and algorithms has hindered the system’s interoperability and data sharing.” In addition to other suggestions, the report also suggested that “encourage the necessary practices to ensure that artificial intelligence in the medical care field Safe, transparency and effective. “

As for the federal priority in state law, the report pointed out that federal legislation is preferred by artificial intelligence laws as the state of artificial intelligence. The priority is a doctrine designed to solve the conflict between the two authoritative institutions such as the Federal Law and the State Law. In the United States, federal law is the highest authority agency. When the two involve the same field and conflict, federal law is preferred in state law. In this context, the report found that “the federal practice on artificial intelligence is complicated and there are advantages and disadvantages.” Nevertheless, the report found that the priority can allow the state to take a lower or upper limit action. There are many aspects of the expected scope of preparation of priority. To solve this problem, the report recommends studying artificial intelligence regulations applied by cross -departments.

Overall, new opportunities for artificial intelligence will be used in these 15 key areas. Therefore, the report encourages Congress to adopt flexible methods to make proper, targeted and regular response measures.